About Us

The CFTC is Shaking Up Sports Betting’s Legal Future

This article was initially published in Law360 on June 25, 2025, and is republished here with consent.

What is gaming? In recent months, this has actually been the concern at the crossway of the investing and wagering industries. On Sept. 6, 2024, in the KalshiEX LLC v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission choice, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia weighed in, ruling that forecasting the winner of a political election does not fall within the scope of “video gaming,” as the term is specified in the Commodity Exchange Act.

This decision opened the floodgates. Companies began pushing the envelope nearly immediately. Commodities markets, which were when limited to traditional instruments to hedge financial danger, discovered themselves complete of opportunities for the public to wager on the result of almost anything.

But is there a line that products agreements can not cross? If the public can utilize these contracts to wager on the winner of a political contest, what is stopping business from providing similar contracts connecting to the result of sporting events?

This article will discuss the relevant regulative landscape, current actions to use sporting occasion agreements, state and federal regulative actions, and – most significantly – whether the sports betting industry remains in the midst of an essential modification.

What Are Event Contracts, and How Are They Regulated?

Financial derivatives are financial investment products frequently noted on exchanges regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

An event contract is a kind of financial derivative, referred to as a swap, for which the payoff is based upon the event, nonoccurence or the degree of the event of a defined future event or contingency related to a possible financial, economic or business consequence.

While traditionally utilized as a tool to hedge versus monetary and economic dangers, there has actually been a recent pattern towards utilizing event agreements as an opportunity to permit financiers to pursue profit on their more speculative forecasts.

Listing a brand-new event agreement on a CFTC-regulated exchange is surprisingly basic. Certain designated agreement markets can self-certify brand-new offerings, testifying that their items adhere to the terms of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC guidelines.

The CFTC, nevertheless, maintains the right to step in and conduct a 90-day evaluation to make sure compliance with the commission’s regulations. For example, CFTC Regulation 40.11 forbids occasion agreements that reference or relate to particular subjects, consisting of terrorism, assassination and – most appropriate here – video gaming.

Cracking Open the Door – the Kalshi Decision

Last year, the CFTC challenged an effort by one business, Kalshi, to note event contracts to forecast the aggregate outcome of U.S. congressional races. The CFTC’s main argument was that these contracts violated the CFTC policy restricting video gaming agreements.

The District of Columbia disagreed, discovering the contracts were allowable under the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations.

The CFTC appealed and further requested that Kalshi’s capability to note the event agreements be remained pending the appeal. On Oct. 2, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decreased to release a stay, enabling Kalshi’s contracts to go live.

Thereafter, Kalshi not just relisted the contracts at concern, but likewise broadened its political election market offerings. To date, the American public has actually thrown more than $1 billion into Kalshi’s political markets, wagering on topics including President Donald Trump’s cabinet nominations, the words Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell will say throughout his next interview, and even whether Trump will add himself to Mount Rushmore.

But Kalshi has not stopped at simply politics. The company continues to expand into the entertainment space, enabling users to forecast everyday top artists on Spotify, Rotten Tomatoes scores for upcoming motion pictures and TV programs, and the next star to play James Bond. For months, however, the concern stayed: Would Kalshi deal sporting event contracts?

Kalshi Takes the Plunge, Offers Sporting Event Contracts

In late December 2024, Kalshi dove in headfirst, self-certifying and listing occasion agreements that allowed the general public to forecast the winner of the Super Bowl and College Football Playoff Championship Game. However, simply days before Trump’s inauguration, the CFTC pushed back, suggesting they meant to examine the legality of sporting occasion contracts.

To date, Kalshi and others continue to use a slew of sports-related offerings on their sites, consisting of markets for all significant American expert sports, college sports and European soccer. Interest has actually expanded. During the 2025 March Madness competition, the American public put over $500 million into Kalshi’s college basketball markets alone.

Reversing Course at the CFTC – From Foe to Friend

Pressure from the CFTC has actually dissipated since the Trump administration took workplace. Republican members of the CFTC have actually been fairly more responsive to the growth of event agreements into less conventional topic and have actually indicated a more lenient approach to the guideline of sports-related occasion agreements.

The acting CFTC chair, Caroline Pham, has actually honestly criticized the commission’s “anti-innovation policies of the previous numerous years.” The presumptive next CFTC chair, Brian Quintenz has actually echoed this belief.

On May 5, the CFTC dropped its appeal of the District of Columbia’s decision. In reaction, Kalshi’s CEO specified, “Kalshi’s technique has officially and definitively secured the future of prediction markets in America.”

Constitutional Questions, Opposition From State Regulators and Tribal Interests

It hasn’t been all smooth cruising for Kalshi, however. Despite subsiding CFTC opposition, a new challenger has actually emerged: state gaming commissions. In current months, gaming commissions in at least 6 states – Nevada, New Jersey, Maryland, Ohio, Montana and Illinois – have released cease-and-desist orders, arguing that providing sporting occasion agreements constitutes the operation of unlicensed sports betting in infraction of state law.

Kalshi has not backed down. In late March in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, the company sued the state’s video gaming regulators in KalshiEX LLC v. Hendric and state video gaming regulators in New Jersey in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty.

Counting on the Constitution’s supremacy clause, Kalshi argued that the actions of state regulators are preempted by the Commodity Exchange Act, in which Congress approved the CFTC special jurisdiction to control monetary derivatives traded on approved exchanges.

Both the District of Nevada and the District of New Jersey agreed with Kalshi, permitting them to continue operating their sporting event markets in the states.

On April 21, Kalshi sued Maryland regulators in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, in LLC v. Martin, asserting the very same preemption arguments in an effort to continue their run of litigation success.

Tribal interests have also been linked, with tribal leaders telling the CFTC that prevalent legalization of sporting event contracts threatens tribal gaming interests.

At his nomination hearing on June 10, though, CFTC chair nominee Brian Quintenz said” [n] othing in the [Commodity Exchange Act] that I’m aware of forbids or impacts the opportunity of people to provide those products, those markets, and those services.”

Is Federal Sports Investing the Future?

If Kalshi’s string of success continues, we may be headed toward a basic shift in the sports wagering industry. Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 choice in Murphy v. NCAA, the choice whether to legalize sports wagering, and in what types, has actually been left to the states. While most states have actually legislated sports wagering, the practice remains outlawed or heavily limited in a variety of states.

If the CFTC continues their hands-off approach and allows Kalshi and other business to continue to offer sporting event agreements on federal exchanges, the existing state-by-state, patchwork system could be in jeopardy. If Kalshi’s constitutional preemption argument prevails, all individuals – even those living in states where sports wagering remains prohibited under state law – would be enabled to purchase sporting occasion contracts.

Not only would this significantly decrease the power of state legislatures and state video gaming regulators, but it would likewise cut into the marketplace shares of existing competitors. Before the increase of Kalshi, online sports books and brick-and-mortar gambling establishments were the only practical legal outlets for sports wagering.

If investment in sporting event agreements is readily available to individuals across the country, despite state lines, the profits of companies and people that run these outlets could take a massive hit.

Practice Tips

– Legal specialists currently associated with the sports betting industry, along with practitioners venturing into this novel location between sports “wagering” and sports “investing” should consider the following tips:
– Familiarize yourself with suitable monetary derivatives laws and regulations, particularly arrangements of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC policies.
– Understand stakeholder roles and interests, particularly state interests in regulating sports betting, including associated tax income, sports book and tribal interests in keeping current market share and the CFTC’s interest in controling federal financial derivatives markets. – Appreciate the constitutional teachings – e.g., preemption – and their possible influence on the future of sports betting and investing.
– Follow continuous developments. Litigation of these disagreements continues across the U.S., and, given the big stakeholders involved, is unlikely to slow down. Congressional action and modifications in CFTC policy likewise have the possible to form the future of the industry.

Somewhat poetically, the only certainty on the planet of sports wagering the last couple of years has been uncertainty. The market remains in unsettled waters, and with the Republican-led federal government just recently set up, there is a new captain in charge.